Saturday, 9th, March, 2025; Richard Keane, CEO Living Positive; Controversial HIV testing bill in South Australia faces backlash
LISTEN TO PODCAST NOW
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 24:57 — 34.3MB)
Subscribe or Follow Us: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | iHeartRadio | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
Macca and Paul are joined live in the studio by Richard Keane, CEO Living Positive; Anti-HIV/AIDs South Australia First-Responders, Health Updates
South Australia is moving to bring in laws forcing people to be tested for HIV despite a report in New South Wales describing similar legislation as ineffective and unneeded.
Health organisation Thorne Harbour Health has expressed strong opposition to the South Australian Government’s proposed Criminal Law (Forensic Procedures) (Blood Testing) Amendment Bill 2024, citing concerns over its scientific validity, potential to spread disinformation, and its exacerbation of stigma toward people living with blood-borne viruses (BBVs).
The bill intends to protect frontline emergency services workers by mandating blood testing of individuals who spit at or bite them. Yet, expert bodies such as the Australasian Society for HIV, Viral Hepatitis and Sexual Health Medicine have firmly stated that mandatory testing for BBVs is not an effective or evidence-based approach to public health.
“We support policies that ensure a safe workplace for all workers, including emergency services personnel. However, this bill is not an evidence-based approach to achieving that goal. It creates unnecessary anxiety for workers and does nothing to improve public health outcomes,” said Thorne Harbour Health Vice President and Secretary of the HIV Justice Network, Paul Kidd.
“The bill, as drafted, does not consider the actual risk of transmission,” said Kidd.
Throne Harbour Health argues that Testing should only be permitted where there is risk of transmission. HIV, Hepatitis B, and Hepatitis C cannot be transmitted through saliva, meaning spitting does not pose a risk.
They also advocate that testing should only be ordered within 72 hours of alleged exposure, as this is the window in which prophylactic interventions (such as post-exposure prophylaxis, or PEP) can prevent transmission. They say the proposed six-month time frame is ineffective and misleading.
They also highlight that emergency service workers should undergo immediate medical treatment if a risk is identified, rather than waiting for mandatory test results that may be misleading or delayed.
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 24:57 — 34.3MB)
Subscribe or Follow Us: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | iHeartRadio | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
RECENT PODCAST
Sat, 29th Nov, 2025: Sarah Witty, ALP MP, Division of Melbourne, Federal Politics Update.
Sarah Witty, MP for Victorian Division of Melbourne, joins Kenny and Paul in the studio as the last guest for ...
LISTEN TO PODCAST NOW
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 12:21 — 14.1MB)
Subscribe or Follow Us: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | iHeartRadio | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
Saturday, 29th, Nov, 2025: Hugo Toovey, Founder of 25 STAY ALIVE
Kenny and Paul talk to Hugo Toovey, Founder of 25 STAY ALIVE! Hugo Toovey is an Army Major in his early ...
LISTEN TO PODCAST NOW
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 14:00 — 16.0MB)
Subscribe or Follow Us: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | iHeartRadio | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS
Saturday, 29th, Nov, 2025: Lucio Ribeiro, Chief AI Officer at TBWA Australia; latest from fast moving world of AI, and the DISRUPT AI Film Festival (Aust. 1st GenAI film fest)
Lucio has held senior executive roles at Optus, Nine, and Seven, founder of three tech businesses, a former lecturer at ...
LISTEN TO PODCAST NOW
Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 14:12 — 16.2MB)
Subscribe or Follow Us: Apple Podcasts | Spotify | Amazon Music | Android | iHeartRadio | TuneIn | Deezer | RSS